Skip to content
Journal On Tourism & Sustainability/JOURNAL ON TOURISM & SUSTAINABILITY/Article
Article recordVersion of recordOpen accessVol. 5 No. 1 (2021): JOURNAL ON TOURISM & SUSTAINABILITYMay 30, 2026DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20464909

Trends and Potential of Eco-tourism Development in Uttarakhand Himalaya

This paper examines the trends and potential of eco-tourism development in the Uttarakhand Himalaya by analysing both the potential of eco-tourism development and eco-tourism resource base. Data were gathered from the U…

  • Contributor 1

Reader actions

Resolve identifiers and download the published files.

View DOIDownload PDF
Abstract
Reader HTML view for the published article record.

This paper examines the trends and potential of eco-tourism development in the Uttarakhand Himalaya by analysing both the potential of eco-tourism development and eco-tourism resource base. Data were gathered from the Uttarakhand Forest Statistical Diary 2017-18 and the Uttarakhand Eco-Tourism Corporation, Dehradun, respectively. The trends of eco-tourists’ inflow in NPs and WLSs and revenue earned from it were examined. The key results from the data analyses depict that the Uttarakhand Himalaya has plenty of eco-tourism resource bases – six national parks (5006.76 km2), seven wildlife sanctuaries (2683.73 km2), and four conservation reserves (212.54 km2) along with rich faunal, floral, and avifaunal diversity. These resource bases have significant potential for eco-tourism development. The trends of eco-tourists’ inflow in the NPs and WLSs are increasing, mainly domestic tourists (r2= 0.941). However, in comparison to natural and pilgrimage tourism, eco-tourists’ inflow is low. In terms of the annual growth rate of eco-tourists’ inflow, it has been decreasing (r2=0.168). The main reasons for decreasing growth rate of eco-tourists’ inflow were remoteness, fragile landscape, rugged terrain, geo-hydrological hazards, lacking infrastructural facilities – transportation, accommodation, and institutional support in eco-tourism destinations. This study recommends policy measures for eco-tourism development in the Uttarakhand Himalaya through the creation of eco-tourism circles, development of eco-tourism parks, and providing adequate infrastructural facilities – transportation, accommodation, institutions, and communication. Keywords: Eco-tourism, national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, trends, eco-tourists’ inflow, Uttarakhand Himalaya.

References
Publication output reuses the stored scholarly reference text rather than a second reference system.
  1. 1.Bagri SC (1994). Strategy for sustainable tourism development for tourism promotion and environment conservation in Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Tourism, 2: 29-52.
  2. 2.Bagri S, Raveendran CG and Bhatt AK (1997). Eco-tourism in India: concepts, definitions, and destination management. IITTM Journal of Travel and Tourism, 2(1): 36-56.
  3. 3.Ballantine JL and Eagles PFJ. (1994). Defining Canadian eco-tourists. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2(4):210-214.
  4. 4.Bansal SP and Kumar J (2011). Eco-tourism for Community Development: A Stakeholder’s Perspective in Great Himalayan National Park. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 31-40.
  5. 5.Bhatnagar VY, Mathur VB and McCarthy, T (2001). A Regional perspective for snow leopard conservation in the Indian Trans-Himalaya, National workshop ‘Regional Planning for Wildlife Protected Areas, 6-8 Aug 2001, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi.
  6. 6.Bhattacharya D, Chowdhury B and Sarkar R. (2011). Irresponsıble Eco-tourism PractıcesFlankıng The Best Natıonal Park In Indıa: A MultıvarıateAnalysıs. 2nd
  7. 7.Internatıonal Conference On Busıness And Economıc Research (2nd Icber 2011)
  8. 8.Bisht H and Negi DS. (1998). Eco-tourism and nature conservation. Seminar proceeding on the growth of sustainable tourism maintaining ecological balance in the Himalayan region, pp. 55.
  9. 9.Black R. (1996). Eco-tourism. What does it really mean? Range 34: 4–7.
  10. 10.Blarney R. (1995). The Nature of Eco-tourism. Bureau of Tourism Research Occasional Paper No. 21. Canberra: Bureau of Tourism Research.
  11. 11.Bookbinder MP, Dinerstein E, Rijal A, Cauley H, Rajouria A. (1998). Eco-tourism support’s to biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology , 12 (6): 1399-1404.
  12. 12.Bottrill CG and Pearce DG. (1995). Eco-tourism: Towards a key elements approach to operationalising the concept. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 3(1):45-54.
  13. 13.Buckley R. (1994). A framework for eco-tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 21(3):661-665.
  14. 14.Butler RW (1980). The concept of a tourism area cycle of evolution and implications for management. Canadian Geographer 24: 5–12
  15. 15.COI (2011). Census of India, Registrar General Publication, New Delhi. 33
  16. 16.GoI. (2008). Uttarakhand Tourism Development Master Plan 2007–2022, Government of India, Retrieved from http://uttarakhandtourism.gov. in/utdb/sites/default/les/volume-3- appendices.pdf (Accessed on March 1, 2021).
  17. 17.Gupta SK and Goel AK (1998). Eco-tourism: concept of environmental sustainability. Seminar proceeding on the growth of sustainable tourism maintaining ecological balance in the Himalayan region. Pp. 47.
  18. 18.Gurung C (1995). Ecolodges and their role in integrated conservation and development’, paper presented at the second International Ecolodge Forum and Field Seminar, San Jose, Costa Rica.
  19. 19.ISFR (2017). India State of Forest Report, Forest Survey of India, MoEFCC, Dehradun
  20. 20.Jaini N, Anuar ANA, Daim MS. (2012). The Practice of Sustainable Tourism in Eco-tourism Sites among Eco-tourism Providers. Asian Social Science, 8(4): 175-179.
  21. 21.Joshi RL. (2011). Eco-tourism Planning and Management On Eco-tourism Destinations of
  22. 22.Bajhang District, Nepal. M. Sc. Forestry (2010-2012), p.11. Online [Available]: http://www.forestrynepal.org/images/ publications/ Eco-tourism %20 destination %20bajhang.pdf.
  23. 23.Kala CP. (2012) High altitude biodiversity of the Alps and the Himalayas: ethno-botany, plant distribution and conservation perspective. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21 (4): 1115- 1126.
  24. 24.Kandari OP and Gusain OP. (2001). National Parks and Equivalent Reserves in Kandari O.P. edited Garhwal Himalaya: Nature, Culture and Society, page 217-238, Transmedia Media House, Srinagar, Garhwal, India.
  25. 25.Sati VP. (2020). Sustainable Tourism Development in the Himalaya: Constraints and Prospects, Springer International Publishers, Cham, Switzerland, P. XXV, 153.
  26. 26.Sati VP. (2019). Himalaya on the Threshold of Change. Springer International Publishers, Switzerland.
  27. 27.Sati VP. (2018). Carrying Capacity Analysis and Destination Development: A Case Study of Gangotri Tourists/Pilgrims’ Circuit in the Himalaya, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research Vol. 23 (3): 312-322, DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2018.1433220.
  28. 28.Sati VP. (2015). Pilgrimage Tourism in Mountain Regions: Socio-Economic Implications in the Garhwal Himalaya, South Asian Journal of Tourism and Heritage, Vol 8(1) Pp: 164-182,
  29. 29.Sati VP. (2013). Tourism Practices and Approaches for its Development in the Uttarakhand Himalaya, India, Journal of Tourism Challenges and Trends, Vol 6 (1), Pp. 97-112.
  30. 30.Singh RB, Mal S, Kala, CP. (2009). Community responses to mountain tourism: A case in Bhyundar Valley, Indian Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Sciences, 6 (4): 394-404.
  31. 31.TugbaKiper (2013). Role of Eco-tourism in Sustainable Development, Advances in Landscape Architecture, Murat Özyavuz, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/55749. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-landscape-architecture/role-of-eco- tourism-in-sustainable-development
  32. 32.UNWTO (2013). UN agency welcomes General Assembly’s adoption of resolution on eco- tourism. United Nations World Tourism Organizations. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=43873&Cr=touri sm&Cr1#.UYivSErEFsg
  33. 33.Vaccaro, Ismael Oriol Beltran, Pierre Alexandre Paquet (2013). Political Ecology and Conservation Policies: Some Theoretical Genealogies, Journal of Political Ecology, Vol 20, No 20, pp 255–272
  34. 34.Wall G. (1994). Eco-tourism: Old wine in new bottles? Trends 31(2): 4-9.
  35. 35.World Bank (2018). Supporting sustainable livelihoods through wildlife tourism, The World Bank Group, Washington
  36. 36.WTO (2018). World Tourism Report, World Tourism Organization
  37. 37.WTTC (2017). World Travel and Tourism Council Travel and Tourism Impact, 2017 World 34 Contributors : Professor Vishwambhar Prasad Sati: Department of Geography and Resource Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl – 796004, Mizoram, Aizawl, India. Corresponding Author: Professor Vishwambhar Prasad Sati. E-mail: sati.vp@gmail.com 35