Skip to content
Journal On Tourism & Sustainability/JOURNAL ON TOURISM & SUSTAINABILITY/Article
Article recordVersion of recordOpen accessVol. 2 No. 2 (2019): JOURNAL ON TOURISM & SUSTAINABILITYMay 30, 2026DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20464848

Transformation of Himalayan Pilgrimage: A Sustainable Travel on the Wane

Despite years of discourse, many tourism scholars hold that pilgrim and tourist are the same while others believe that a pilgrim (religious tourist) and a tourist (secular pilgrim) are distinct in their motivations, beh…

  • Contributor 1
  • Contributor 2

Reader actions

Resolve identifiers and download the published files.

View DOIDownload PDF
Abstract
Reader HTML view for the published article record.

Despite years of discourse, many tourism scholars hold that pilgrim and tourist are the same while others believe that a pilgrim (religious tourist) and a tourist (secular pilgrim) are distinct in their motivations, behaviours and use of services. Some call them ‘quasi-pilgrim’ or ‘half tourist’ due to lack of understanding. This paper is an effort to re-examine the two epithets by using the case of Himalayan pilgrimage, which was systems based, i.e. had respect for the integrity of ecosystems, and prophylactic in nature, maintaining culture and values. This traditional pilgrimage system worked on the principle of pilgrim economy, which was based on austerity and principles of ethics and equity within the religious framework, violation of which was an act of blasphemy. With the onslaught of modern tourism this age-old traditional Himalayan pilgrimage system has been transformed gradually. This paper pleads to revitalize the old Yatra practice before it comes to an end. The revitalization process should be according to the diktat provided in Hindu scripture namely Skand Puranas. Traditional pilgrimages by their very nature were designed to be sustainable in terms of resource use. A pilgrim and a tourist are made of different virtues – the pilgrim being pious and humble while a tourist may be a pleasure-seeker. Before this land of gods transforms into pleasure dome, the concerned stakeholder, the Badrinath temple committee in particular should cry halt to this process of transformation. The grand dhamas yatra should be considered as national heritage. Keywords: Pilgrimage, transformation, pilgrim economy, Hindu Tirtha, sustainability, mountain communities.

References
Publication output reuses the stored scholarly reference text rather than a second reference system.
  1. 1.Bernbaum, E. (1990). Sacred Mo untains of the World. Sierra Club Books: San Francisco.
  2. 2.Bhardwaj, S. (1973). Hindu Places of Pilgrimage in India: A Study in Cultural Geography . University of California: Berkley.
  3. 3.Butler, R. and Suntikul, W. (2018). Tourism and Religion: Issues and Implica tions . Bristol: CVP.
  4. 4.Cohen, E. (1979). A phenomenology of tourist experiences. Sociology, 13 , 179 - 201.
  5. 5.Eade, J. (1992). Pilgrimage and tourism at Lourdes, Frances. Annals of Tourism Research 19(1) : 18 - 32.
  6. 6.Eck, D. (1981). India's "T ī rthas": "Crossings" in Sacred Geography. History of Religion 20(4) .
  7. 7.Fretchling, D.C. (1976). Proposed standard definitions and classification for research. In Proceedings of TTRA conference. San Diego, California. Kalyan Tirthank (Hindi) Volume 31 . Gita P ress. Gorakhpur. 44
  8. 8.Kaur, J. (1985). Himalayan Pilgrimage and the New Tourism . Himalayan Books: New Delhi.
  9. 9.Krippendorf, J. (1987). The Holiday Makers: Understanding the impact of Leisure Travel . Heinemann : London.
  10. 10.Mabbet, I. W. (1968). A Short History of India . Cassell Australia Ltd.: Sydney
  11. 11.Margry, P, J. (2015). Whisky and Pilgrimage: Cleaning up communalities . In Singh, T. V. (Ed). Challenges in Tourism Research (pp.53 - 58). Bristol: CVP.
  12. 12.Moscardo, G. (2015). A Journey in search of ‘self’ and the ‘other’. In Singh, T. V. (Ed). Challenges in Tourism Research (pp.72 - 81). Bristol: CVP.
  13. 13.Nand, N. and Kumar. K. (1989). The Holy Himalaya . Daya Publishing House: Delhi.
  14. 14.Shankaratayan, R. (1959). Ghummakar Shastra (Hindi). Kitab Mahal: Allahabad.
  15. 15.Singh, T. V. (1975) . Tourism and Tourist Industry . New Heights: Delhi.
  16. 16.Singh, T. V. and Kaur, J. (1985). In Search of Holistic Tourism for the Himalaya. In T.V. Singh and J. Kaur (Eds), Integrated Mountain Development (pp. 365 - 389). Himalayan Book: New Delhi.
  17. 17.Singh, T. V. (2015). Introduction. In Singh, T. V. (Ed). Challenges in Tourism Research (pp.1 - 15). Bristol: CVP.
  18. 18.Singh, T. V. (2017). Editorial: Is our Planet in Peril? The Imperative of sustainability. Tourism Recreation Research, 42 (4), 407 - 408.
  19. 19.Timothy, D. and Olsen, D. (2006). Tourism, Religion and Spiritual Journeys . Routledge: New York.
  20. 20.Turner, V. W. and Turner, E. (1978). Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture. Anthropological Perspectives . New York/Oxford: Columbia UP/Blackwell.
  21. 21.UNWTO (1993). UNWTO News . UNWTO: Madrid.
  22. 22.Wallace, A. F. C. (1956). Revitalization Mo vements. American Anthropologist, 58(2), 264 - 281.
  23. 23.Wall, G. & Mathieson, A. (2006). Tourism: Change, Impacts and Opportunities. Pearson Education Limited: Harlow. Contributors: Professor Tej Vir Singh : Director, Centre for Tourism Research and Development, A - 965/6 Indira Nagar, Lucknow, UP, India; Dr Gaitree (Vanessa) Gowreesunkar : Head of Department and Senior Lecturer , Department of Tourism and Hospitality , University of Africa, Baylesa State, Nigeria. Corresponding Author : Prof Tej Vir Singh. Email: tejvirsingh@gmail.com 45