Sustainability has been coined ‘one of the most successful concepts in tourism and event studies and has experienced exponential growth since the mid-1980s’ (Hall, 2010). Despite its emergence as a popular concept, sustainability is a complex issue that has been poorly understood by stakeholders, policy makers and organisers of mega-sport events, such as the Olympic Games. Lohman and Dredge (2012) have noted that even though humans are a fundamental part of the natural environment leading policy makers such as the International Olympic Committee have created policies that solely consider impacts on the physical environment (i.e. transportation and pollution) while ommiting other equally significant environmental impacts such as community displacement (Porter et. al., 2009), use of facilities after the event (Hiller, 2006) and uneven distribution of benefits within the host community (Gaffney, 2010). The aim of this review is to present an historical account of the evolution of sustainability as a concept and to discuss the issues surrounding environmental sustainability of those Summer and Winter Olympic Games that have had an impact on the natural environment either positive or negative..An overview of key events and developments to improve sustainability, such as the Olympic Charter (IOC, 2007), the International Standards Organisation (ISO, 2010) and the Sustainable Sourcing Code (LOCOG, 2012) will be presented amongst others. An overview of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games environmental agenda will be presented. The review will also discuss aspects of environmental sustainability such as population displacement, human rights, and host city residents’ quality of life that are often not considered as part of environmental agendas. Even though the review focusses on Olympic Games, there are implications for other mega-sport events such as the Commonwealth Games and the FIFA World Cup. Keywords: Olympic Games, Environmental Sustainability, Positive and Negative Impact
- 1.Ackermann, K. (2011) (ed.). Sustainable mega events in developing countries: experiences and insights from host cities of South Africa, India and Brazil. Summary Report. Konrad - Adenauer - Stiftung.
- 2.Aichi Expo, Japan (2005). Environmental Report: clean air initiative. Available from: http://cleanairinitiative.org/portal/system/files/Aichi_Expo_2005.pdf
- 3.Busa, F., Min, Z., Jianzhong, W., González Loscertales, V., Jian, C., Bertone, T. (2010). Chapter 10: Mega - events as catalysts for urban transformation. Shanghai Manual – A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development in the 21st Century. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/susdevtopics/sdt_pdfs/shanghaimanual/Chapter%2010%20 - %20Mega%20events.pdf
- 4.Brooks, B. (2016). Rio’s Olympic air: dirty, deadly and no cleaner legacy from Games. Sports News, 1st August 2016. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us - olympics - rio - air - insight - idUSKCN10C24T
- 5.Cantelon, H., Letters, M. (2000). The making of the IOC environmental policy as the third dimension of the Olympic Movement. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35(3): 2 94 - 308.
- 6.Climate Action and UNEP (2014). The green Olympic Games: Tokyo 2020. Interview with
- 7.Tsunekazu Takeda, IOC member and President of Tokyo 2020. Available from: http://www.climateactionprogramme.org/climate - leader - interviews/the_green_games_tokyo_2020
- 8.Coackley, J., Souza, D.L. (2013). S port mega - events: Can legacies and development be equitable and sustainable? Motriz: Revista Educao Fisica, 19 (3 ) Rio Claro July/Sept. 2013
- 9.COHRE (2007). Report for the UN Special Raporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, Raquel Rolnik, A/HRC/13/20; and Fair play for housing rights: mega events, Olympic Games and housing rights, p.28.
- 10.Commiss ion for Sustainable London 2012 (2011). Fit for purpose? A review of inclusion and healthy living across the London 2012 programme. Available from: ht tp://www.cslondon.org/wp - content/uploads/downloads/2011/03/CSL_Fit - for - purpose - 2011.pdf
- 11.Digges, C. (2014). Olympic gashes and landfills cleave nature, and locals’ hearts. Bellona January 30. Accessed January 4, 2015 http://bellona.org/news/russian - human - ri ghts - issues/2014 - 01 - olympic - gashes - landfills - cleave - nature - locals - hearts.
- 12.Essex, S., Chalkley, B. (1998). Olympic Games: catalyst for urban change. Leisure Studies, 17: 187 - 206. Corresponding Author : Dr Maria Konstantaki, School of Health and Social Sciences, Bucks New University, UK. Email: Maria.Konstantaki@bucks.ac.uk 64
- 13.Fredline, E., Faulkner, B. (2002). Variations in residents’ reactions to m ajor motorsport events - Why residents perceive the impacts of events differently. Event Management, 7(2), 115 – 126.
- 14.Gaffney, C. (2010). Mega events and socio - spatial dynamics in Rio de Janeiro, 1919 - 2016. Journal of Latin American Geography, 9(1): 7 - 29.
- 15.G irginov, V., Parry, J. (2005). The Olympic Games explained: a student guide to the evolution of the modern Olympic Games. London: Routledge.
- 16.Gold, J.R. and Gold, M.M., 2013. “Bring it under the legacy umbrella”: Olympic host cities and the changing fortunes of the sustainability agenda. Sustainability , 5 (8), pp.3526 - 3542.
- 17.Hall, C.M. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance. From first and second to third order change? Journal of Sustsainable Tourism, 13(5): 401 - 417 .
- 18.Hall, C.M. (2012). Sustainable mega - events: beyond the myth of balanced approaches to mega event sustainability. Event Management, 16(2): 119 - 131.
- 19.Horst, S. (2012). Let the sustainability games begin. US Green Building Council Articles. Avalable from: http://www.usgbc.org/articles/let - sustainability - games - begin
- 20.Human Rights Watch (2008). ‘One year of my blood’: exploitation of migrant construction workers in Beijing. Available f rom: http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/01/21/us - olympics - beijing - deaths - idUSSP8764420080121
- 21.International Olympic Committee (IOC) (2013). Factsheet: the Olympic Movement. Update,
- 22.October 2013. Available from: http://www.olympic.org/documents/reference_documents_factsheets/the_olympic_mov ement.pdf
- 23.IO C (2013). Factsheet: Legacies of the Olympic Games. Update, December 2013. Available from: http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Reference_documents_Factsheets/Legacy.pdf International Standards Organisation (ISO) (20121). Event sustainability management system. Available from: www.iso20121.org
- 24.ISO (26100: 2010). Guidance on social responsibility. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:42546:en Kravchenko, S. (2014a). Sochi: untreated sewage drained into sea. Caucasian Knot February
- 25.21. Accessed December 15, 2014 http://eng.kavkaz - uzel.ru/articles/27359/.
- 26.LOCOG Sustainable Sourcing Code (2011). Learning legacy: lessons learnt from planning and staging the London 2012 Games. Available from: http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/documents/pdfs/sustainability/cp - locog - sustainable - sourcing - code.pdf
- 27.Lenskyj, H. (2000). The best Olympics ever? Social impa cts of Sydney 2000. New York: State University of New York Press.
- 28.Minnaert, L. (2012). An Olympic legacy for all? The non - infrastructural outcomes of the
- 29.Olympic Games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996 – Beijing 2008). Tourism Management , 33 (2), 361 - 370. Ministerio do Esporte, Governo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro y Prefetura Municipal do Rio de Janeiro: Candidature File for Rio de Janeiro to host the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic
- 30.Müller, M. (2011): Popular perception of urban transformation through mega - events: understanding support for the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Environment and Planning A: 43(9), 2091 - 2108.
- 31.Müller, M., (2015). (Im - ) Mobile policies: Why sustainability went wrong in the 2014 Olympics in Sochi. Europea n Urban and Regional Studies , 22 (2), pp.191 - 209. Corresponding Author : Dr Maria Konstantaki, School of Health and Social Sciences, Bucks New University, UK. Email: Maria.Konstantaki@bucks.ac.uk 65
- 32.Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) (2013). Brazil: championing football, but what about housing rights? Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13456
- 33.Petersson, B., Vamling, K. (2016). Vanished in the Haze: White Elephants, Environmental Degradation and Circassian Marginalization in Post - Olympics Sochi. In: Mega Events in Post - Soviet Eurasia (pp. 59 - 76). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
- 34.PlayFair (2008). No medal for the Olympics on labour rights. Available from: http://www.playfair2008.org/docs /playfair_2008 - report.pdf
- 35.Porter, L. (2009). Planning displacement: the real legacy of major sporting events. Planning, Theory and Practice, 10(3): 395 - 418. Petersen, E., Wilson, M. E., Touch, S., McCloskey, B., Mwaba, P., Bates, M., ... & Azhar, E. I. (2 016). Rapid spread of Zika virus in the Americas - implications for public health preparedness for mass gatherings at the 2016 Brazil Olympic Games. International Journal of Infectious Diseases , 44 , 11 - 15.
- 36.Reyes, O. (2005). The Olympics and the City. The Oly mpics and the City. Red Pepper Magazine. April 1. Available from: http://www.redpepper.org.uk/article555.html/ .
- 37.The Organising Committee for the XVIII Nagano Winter Olympic Games (1998). Official Report: Planning and support, Volume 1. Nagano, Japan. Available from: http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Reports/Official%20Past%20Games%20Reports/ Winter/EN/1998_Nagano_Vol1_e.pdf
- 38.Sydney Olympic Park Authority (SOPA) (2003). State of Environment Report. Available from: www.sopa.nsw.gov.au
- 39.Tatoglu, E., Erdal, F. (2002). Resident attitudes toward tourism impacts: the case of Kusadasi in Turke y. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration , 3(3), 79 – 100.
- 40.Timms, J. (2012). The Olympics as a platform for protest: a case study of the London 2012 ‘ethical’ Games and the PlayFair campaign for workers’ rights. Leisure Studies, 31(3): 355 - 372.
- 41.Trusen, C. (2011). The 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games: event - greening case study. In: Ackermann, K. (ed.), Sustainable mega events in developing countries: experiences and insights from host cities of South Africa, India and Brazil. Su mmary Report. Konrad - Adenauer - Stiftung. p. 37.
- 42.United Nations (1992). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. Rio declaration on environment and development. Statement of Forest Principles. New York: United Nations.
- 43.Wahlers, G. (2011) . Foreword. In: Sustainable mega events in developing countries: experiences and insights from host cities of South Africa, India and Brazil. Summary Report. Konrad - Adenauer - Stiftung. p. 12.
- 44.Waitt, G. (2003). The social impacts of the Sydney Olympics. Annals of Tourism Research , 30(1), 194 – 215.
- 45.Wolfe, S.D. (2013). Life on the Ground: a comparative analysis of two villages in Sochi during Olympic transformation. Euxeinos, 12:36 - 46.
- 46.WWF - Russia . Undated. Mistakes of Sochi - 2014. Accessed January 5, 2015 ht tp://wwf.ru/about/positions/sochi2014/eng.
- 47.World Conservation Union (IUCN), UNEP, and WWF (1991). Caring for the earth: a strategy for sustainable living. Gland, Switzerland. Available from: https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/CFE - 003.pdf
- 48.World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Report). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford Uni versity Press. Corresponding Author : Dr Maria Konstantaki, School of Health and Social Sciences, Bucks New University, UK. Email: Maria.Konstantaki@bucks.ac.uk 66