Skip to content
Beta

Scholardemia is in beta.

Write & submit your review

3 min readUpdated 10 July 2026Peer review

Once you have accepted an invitation, your review lives on the journal’s Reviews page. Read the manuscript through your reviewer copy, annotate as you go, then complete the review form when your assessment is ready.

Read & annotate

Your reviewer snapshot is a copy of the manuscript you can comment on without affecting the authors’ document. Highlight passages and leave comments exactly as you would in any Scholardemia document; they are saved with the snapshot and visible to the editorial team.

The review form

The submission dialog asks for:

  • Summary, strengths, weaknesses, and actionable advice: four short structured assessments, all required.
  • Comments to the author: feedback intended for the authors. Editors control when and how these are released.
  • Confidential comments to the editor: anything the editors should know that the authors should not see.
  • A recommendation: Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, or Reject. Recommendations go to the editors and are not sent to authors as-is.
  • A conflict-of-interest declaration, confirming either no conflict or a disclosed one.

Some journals add scored criteria on a rating scale, or their own questions; these appear in the same form.

Submit

Check your text, then submit. The assignment is marked complete, the editors are notified, and the form locks; contact the editorial team if something needs correcting after submission. How your review feeds into the decision is described in Meta-review & editor decisions.

Write for two audiences.Keep author-facing comments constructive and specific enough to act on, and reserve candid concerns about the work’s viability for the confidential comments to the editor.

Still stuck? Talk to a person.

Our support team reads every message. Include what you were doing, any error message, and a screenshot if you have one; it usually saves a round-trip.

Email support